Advertisement
LIDR vs NETTF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDR is a Hold and NETTF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIDR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNETTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LIDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NETTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIDR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NETTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LIDR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NETTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LIDR (@Computer Communications) experienced а -0.35% price change this week, while NETTF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -11.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.61%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.77%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+1.14% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Electronics/Appliances (-2.44% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| LIDR | NETTF | LIDR / NETTF | |
| Capitalization | 112M | 85.2B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -32.2M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 120.472 | 45.506 | 265% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 17.05 | - |
| Revenue | 236K | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 19.2M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.06M | N/A | - |
| LIDR | NETTF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 8 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
LIDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LIDR and ARBE have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIDR and ARBE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIDR | 100% | -2.10% | ||
| ARBE - LIDR | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NEOJF - LIDR | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AI - LIDR | 30% Poorly correlated | -7.31% | ||
| FHGDF - LIDR | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BB - LIDR | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
More | ||||
NETTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NETTF has been loosely correlated with NTES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NETTF jumps, then NTES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NETTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NETTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTES - NETTF | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| PTRRF - NETTF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TUYA - NETTF | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.98% | ||
| GEN - NETTF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| LIDR - NETTF | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.10% | ||
More | ||||