LIDR
Price
$0.90
Change
+$0.10 (+12.50%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.84M
NEOJF
Price
$11.53
Change
+$1.86 (+19.23%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
108.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIDR vs NEOJF

Header iconLIDR vs NEOJF Comparison
Open Charts LIDR vs NEOJFBanner chart's image
AEye
Price$0.90
Change+$0.10 (+12.50%)
Volume$1.95M
Capitalization7.84M
NEOJAPAN
Price$11.53
Change+$1.86 (+19.23%)
Volume$200
Capitalization108.94M
LIDR vs NEOJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEOJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIDR vs. NEOJF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDR is a Buy and NEOJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LIDR: $0.90 vs. NEOJF: $11.53)
Brand notoriety: LIDR and NEOJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIDR: 269% vs. NEOJF: 74%
Market capitalization -- LIDR: $7.84M vs. NEOJF: $108.94M
LIDR [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.84M. NEOJF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $108.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIDR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEOJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LIDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEOJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEOJF is a better buy in the long-term than LIDR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIDR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEOJF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIDR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NEOJF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIDR is a better buy in the short-term than NEOJF.

Price Growth

LIDR (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.22% price change this week, while NEOJF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEOJF($109M) has a higher market cap than LIDR($7.84M). NEOJF YTD gains are higher at: 19.235 vs. LIDR (-29.496). NEOJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. LIDR (-81.44M). NEOJF has more cash in the bank: 4.9B vs. LIDR (45.9M). NEOJF has less debt than LIDR: NEOJF (311K) vs LIDR (15.5M). NEOJF has higher revenues than LIDR: NEOJF (6.16B) vs LIDR (2.49M).
LIDRNEOJFLIDR / NEOJF
Capitalization7.84M109M7%
EBITDA-81.44M1.41B-6%
Gain YTD-29.49619.235-153%
P/E RatioN/A18.42-
Revenue2.49M6.16B0%
Total Cash45.9M4.9B1%
Total Debt15.5M311K4,984%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIDRNEOJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEOJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEQTX29.260.10
+0.34%
Fidelity Equity Dividend Income
UIVVX12.530.03
+0.24%
MFS Intrinsic Value A
PNEAX10.220.02
+0.20%
Virtus NFJ Dividend Value A
KCSIX12.810.02
+0.17%
Knights of Columbus Small Cap I
TEGAX40.940.06
+0.15%
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth A

LIDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIDR has been loosely correlated with ARBE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIDR jumps, then ARBE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIDR
1D Price
Change %
LIDR100%
+12.21%
ARBE - LIDR
42%
Loosely correlated
-7.77%
REKR - LIDR
40%
Loosely correlated
-8.80%
INTZ - LIDR
36%
Loosely correlated
-5.51%
USIO - LIDR
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
MSAI - LIDR
32%
Poorly correlated
-6.66%
More

NEOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NEOJF and LIDR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEOJF and LIDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEOJF
1D Price
Change %
NEOJF100%
N/A
LIDR - NEOJF
30%
Poorly correlated
+12.21%
HUBC - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
-7.18%
RELY - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
TENB - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFLT - NEOJF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More