LIDR
Price
$1.10
Change
-$0.20 (-15.38%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
NEOJF
Price
$9.67
Change
+$1.44 (+17.50%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Ad is loading...

LIDR vs NEOJF

Header iconLIDR vs NEOJF Comparison
Open Charts LIDR vs NEOJFBanner chart's image
AEye
Price$1.10
Change-$0.20 (-15.38%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
NEOJAPAN
Price$9.67
Change+$1.44 (+17.50%)
Volume$288
CapitalizationN/A
LIDR vs NEOJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIDR vs. NEOJF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDR is a Hold and NEOJF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (LIDR: $1.30 vs. NEOJF: $9.67)
Brand notoriety: LIDR and NEOJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIDR: 1130% vs. NEOJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LIDR: $7.84M vs. NEOJF: $108.94M
LIDR [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.84M. NEOJF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $108.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIDR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNEOJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LIDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NEOJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEOJF is a better buy in the long-term than LIDR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIDR’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LIDR’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

LIDR (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.88% price change this week, while NEOJF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIDR is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEOJF($109M) has a higher market cap than LIDR($7.84M). NEOJF YTD gains are higher at: 33.196 vs. LIDR (-43.231). NEOJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. LIDR (-81.44M). NEOJF has more cash in the bank: 4.9B vs. LIDR (45.9M). NEOJF has less debt than LIDR: NEOJF (311K) vs LIDR (15.5M). NEOJF has higher revenues than LIDR: NEOJF (6.16B) vs LIDR (2.49M).
LIDRNEOJFLIDR / NEOJF
Capitalization7.84M109M7%
EBITDA-81.44M1.41B-6%
Gain YTD-43.23133.196-130%
P/E RatioN/A18.42-
Revenue2.49M6.16B0%
Total Cash45.9M4.9B1%
Total Debt15.5M311K4,984%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIDR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

LIDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LIDR and NEOJF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIDR and NEOJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIDR
1D Price
Change %
LIDR100%
+3.17%
NEOJF - LIDR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FHGDF - LIDR
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IREHF - LIDR
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EGHT - LIDR
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.55%
SANG - LIDR
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
More

NEOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NEOJF and LIDR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEOJF and LIDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEOJF
1D Price
Change %
NEOJF100%
N/A
LIDR - NEOJF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
HUBC - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
+9.00%
RELY - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TENB - NEOJF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
CFLT - NEOJF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More