Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIDFX vs TRIGX
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LIDFX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value F
Price$9.50
Change-$0.13 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets450.49M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.92
Change-$0.28 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.05B
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIDFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDFX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. LIDFX (450M). LIDFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LIDFX (2.79) vs TRIGX (2.11). LIDFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LIDFX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and LIDFX (0.84) have similar cost to investors . LIDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). LIDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: LIDFX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.76 vs. LIDFX (20.67). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 96.83 vs. LIDFX (71.45).
| LIDFX | TRIGX | LIDFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.268 | 23.131 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 450M | 15B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.11 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.67 | 23.76 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.76 | 66.38 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.45 | 96.83 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.56 | 68.52 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers