Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIDFX vs TRIGX
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LIDFX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value F
Price$11.39
Change+$1.57 (+15.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets525.14M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$25.75
Change+$2.94 (+12.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.14B
LIDFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIDFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDFX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. LIDFX (525M). LIDFX (2.52) and TRIGX (2.47) have matching dividends . LIDFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LIDFX (18 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). LIDFX (0.84) and TRIGX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . LIDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). LIDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: LIDFX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.40 vs. LIDFX (43.63). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 101.32 vs. LIDFX (71.30).
| LIDFX | TRIGX | LIDFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.81 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.81 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.150 | 8.284 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 525M | 17.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 2.47 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.63 | 50.40 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.43 | 85.64 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.30 | 101.32 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.87 | 163.24 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement