Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIDCX vs TRIGX
LIDCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LIDCX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value C
Price$10.00
Change-$0.09 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets482.85M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.55
Change-$0.17 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.84B
LIDCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIDCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. LIDCX (483M). LIDCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LIDCX (2.18) vs TRIGX (1.90). LIDCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LIDCX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). LIDCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). LIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). LIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: LIDCX (1500) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.57 vs. LIDCX (29.77). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 98.02 vs. LIDCX (59.18).
| LIDCX | TRIGX | LIDCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.87 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.87 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.562 | 39.612 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 483M | 16.8B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.18 | 1.90 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.77 | 38.57 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 84.72 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.18 | 98.02 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.29 | 113.16 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers