Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIDCX vs TRIGX
LIDCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LIDCX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value C
Price$9.38
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.94M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.75B
LIDCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIDCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. LIDCX (456M). LIDCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LIDCX (2.18) vs TRIGX (2.04). LIDCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LIDCX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). LIDCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). LIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). LIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: LIDCX (1500) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.12 vs. LIDCX (19.98). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.95 vs. LIDCX (67.69).
| LIDCX | TRIGX | LIDCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.87 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.87 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.062 | 26.780 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 456M | 15.8B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.18 | 2.04 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.98 | 25.12 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.64 | 72.07 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.69 | 99.95 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.47 | 78.90 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement