Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIDAX vs TRIGX
LIDAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LIDAX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value A
Price$10.84
Change+$0.09 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets506.45M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$24.77
Change+$0.17 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.14B
LIDAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIDAX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDAX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. LIDAX (506M). TRIGX (2.65) and LIDAX (2.56) have matching dividends . LIDAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LIDAX (18 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). LIDAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). LIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). LIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: LIDAX (1500) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.94 vs. LIDAX (43.11). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 92.60 vs. LIDAX (55.91).
| LIDAX | TRIGX | LIDAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.87 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.87 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.089 | 4.163 | 50% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 506M | 17.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 2.65 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.11 | 50.94 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.34 | 79.65 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.91 | 92.60 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.27 | 155.12 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement