LICY
Price
$2.31
Change
-$0.27 (-10.47%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
NWLXF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

LICY vs NWLXF

Header iconLICY vs NWLXF Comparison
Open Charts LICY vs NWLXFBanner chart's image
Li-Cycle Holdings
Price$2.31
Change-$0.27 (-10.47%)
Volume$1.3M
CapitalizationN/A
NEWLOX GOLD VENTURES
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.2K
CapitalizationN/A
LICY vs NWLXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LICY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LICY vs. NWLXF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICY is a Hold and NWLXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (LICY: $2.31 vs. NWLXF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: LICY and NWLXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LICY: 96% vs. NWLXF: 27%
Market capitalization -- LICY: $184.42M vs. NWLXF: $16.63M
LICY [@Environmental Services] is valued at $184.42M. NWLXF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $16.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LICY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNWLXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LICY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NWLXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LICY and NWLXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LICY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LICY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

LICY (@Environmental Services) experienced а -36.01% price change this week, while NWLXF (@Environmental Services) price change was +49.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

LICY is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-4.57% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LICY($184M) has a higher market cap than NWLXF($16.6M). NWLXF YTD gains are higher at: -42.803 vs. LICY (-50.624). NWLXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -701.53K vs. LICY (-121.4M). LICY has more cash in the bank: 70.6M vs. NWLXF (1.48M). NWLXF has less debt than LICY: NWLXF (2.23M) vs LICY (351M). LICY has higher revenues than NWLXF: LICY (18.3M) vs NWLXF (3.11M).
LICYNWLXFLICY / NWLXF
Capitalization184M16.6M1,108%
EBITDA-121.4M-701.53K17,305%
Gain YTD-50.624-42.803118%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue18.3M3.11M589%
Total Cash70.6M1.48M4,777%
Total Debt351M2.23M15,761%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LICY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LICY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

NWLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWLXF and AQMS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWLXF and AQMS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWLXF
1D Price
Change %
NWLXF100%
N/A
AQMS - NWLXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
VEOEF - NWLXF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
VCIGF - NWLXF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LICY - NWLXF
7%
Poorly correlated
-10.47%
CTRNF - NWLXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More