Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LICPX vs VFWPX
LICPX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts LICPX vs VFWPX
Lord Abbett International Equity P
Price$19.63
Change+$1.41 (+7.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.28M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$163.39
Change+$13.31 (+8.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.2B
LICPX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LICPX vs. VFWPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICPX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. LICPX (643M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than LICPX: VFWPX (2.93) vs LICPX (0.76). LICPX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: LICPX (22 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). LICPX (1.17) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). LICPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. VFWPX (6.00). LICPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: LICPX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.29 vs. LICPX (32.22). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.77 vs. LICPX (26.15).
| LICPX | VFWPX | LICPX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.03 | 3,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.03 | 3,900% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.814 | 6.471 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 643M | 78.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 2.93 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.22 | 34.29 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.08 | 47.98 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.15 | 34.77 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.15 | 110.45 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers