LICN
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
31.01M
PGCSF
Price
$1.93
Change
+$0.33 (+20.63%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
982.01M
Ad is loading...

LICN vs PGCSF

Header iconLICN vs PGCSF Comparison
Open Charts LICN vs PGCSFBanner chart's image
Lichen China
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$130.93M
Capitalization31.01M
Prosegur Cia De Securidad SA
Price$1.93
Change+$0.33 (+20.63%)
Volume$5.58K
Capitalization982.01M
LICN vs PGCSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LICN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LICN vs. PGCSF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICN is a Hold and PGCSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (LICN: $0.08 vs. PGCSF: $1.93)
Brand notoriety: LICN and PGCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LICN: 548% vs. PGCSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LICN: $31.01M vs. PGCSF: $982.01M
LICN [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $31.01M. PGCSF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $982.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LICN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGCSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LICN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PGCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PGCSF is a better buy in the long-term than LICN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LICN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LICN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

LICN (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +20.00% price change this week, while PGCSF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +92.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

LICN is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.23% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGCSF($982M) has a higher market cap than LICN($31M). PGCSF has higher P/E ratio than LICN: PGCSF (20.33) vs LICN (5.96). PGCSF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. LICN (-56.081).
LICNPGCSFLICN / PGCSF
Capitalization31M982M3%
EBITDAN/A239M-
Gain YTD-56.0810.000-
P/E Ratio5.9620.3329%
RevenueN/A4.3B-
Total CashN/A726M-
Total DebtN/A131M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LICN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LICN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

LICN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LICN and CHGG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LICN and CHGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LICN
1D Price
Change %
LICN100%
+9.86%
CHGG - LICN
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
GV - LICN
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.14%
GEO - LICN
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.24%
COUR - LICN
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
CTAS - LICN
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
More

PGCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGCSF and FHSEY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGCSF and FHSEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGCSF
1D Price
Change %
PGCSF100%
N/A
FHSEY - PGCSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
JZ - PGCSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
PMEC - PGCSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.09%
LICN - PGCSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+9.86%
QSG - PGCSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More