Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LICCX vs VFWPX
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts LICCX vs VFWPX
Lord Abbett International Equity C
Price$19.66
Change+$1.44 (+7.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.28M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$163.39
Change+$13.31 (+8.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.2B
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LICCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. LICCX (643M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than LICCX: VFWPX (2.93) vs LICCX (0.45). LICCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: LICCX (22 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). LICCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). LICCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. VFWPX (6.00). LICCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: LICCX (1500) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.29 vs. LICCX (31.45). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.77 vs. LICCX (23.47).
| LICCX | VFWPX | LICCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.03 | 5,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.03 | 5,733% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.799 | 6.471 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 643M | 78.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 2.93 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.45 | 34.29 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.57 | 47.98 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.47 | 34.77 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.96 | 110.45 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement