Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LICCX vs VFWPX
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts LICCX vs VFWPX
Lord Abbett International Equity C
Price$18.47
Change-$0.23 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets508.74M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$152.44
Change-$1.59 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
LICCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LICCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LICCX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. LICCX (509M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than LICCX: VFWPX (2.70) vs LICCX (0.41). LICCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: LICCX (22 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). LICCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). LICCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). LICCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: LICCX (1500) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.36 vs. LICCX (22.84). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 39.87 vs. LICCX (29.20).
| LICCX | VFWPX | LICCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.03 | 5,733% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.03 | 5,733% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.966 | 29.164 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 509M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 2.70 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.84 | 25.36 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.84 | 50.03 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.20 | 39.87 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.12 | 79.71 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers