Advertisement
LI vs NIO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LI is a Buy and NIO is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NIO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- NIO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LI (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -5.37% price change this week, while NIO (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -12.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
LI is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2026.
NIO is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (+2.42% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| LI | NIO | LI / NIO | |
| Capitalization | 18.2B | 12.6B | 144% |
| EBITDA | 9.62B | -22.99B | -42% |
| Gain YTD | -27.303 | 9.862 | -277% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.15 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 145B | 69.4B | 209% |
| Total Cash | 107B | 17.8B | 601% |
| Total Debt | 16.9B | 29.1B | 58% |
NIO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LI | NIO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XYZY | 33.40 | 0.69 | +2.11% |
| YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| BBAG | 46.67 | 0.11 | +0.24% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Aggt Bond ETF | |||
| XISE | 30.18 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| FT Vest US Eq Buf & Prm IncETF-Sept | |||
| PMMY | 25.85 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May | |||
| QID | 19.93 | -0.10 | -0.50% |
| ProShares UltraShort QQQ | |||
LI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LI has been loosely correlated with BYDDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LI jumps, then BYDDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LI | 100% | -3.65% | ||
| BYDDF - LI | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| XPEV - LI | 56% Loosely correlated | -4.02% | ||
| BYDDY - LI | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| NIO - LI | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.77% | ||
| ZK - LI | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||
NIO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIO has been loosely correlated with BYDDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NIO jumps, then BYDDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIO | 100% | -4.77% | ||
| BYDDF - NIO | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| XPEV - NIO | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.02% | ||
| LI - NIO | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| BYDDY - NIO | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| ZK - NIO | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||