LI
Price
$16.78
Change
+$0.09 (+0.54%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
16.94B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NIO
Price
$4.91
Change
+$0.02 (+0.41%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
12.44B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LI vs NIO

Header iconLI vs NIO Comparison
Open Charts LI vs NIOBanner chart's image
Li Auto
Price$16.78
Change+$0.09 (+0.54%)
Volume$914.88K
Capitalization16.94B
NIO
Price$4.91
Change+$0.02 (+0.41%)
Volume$13.28M
Capitalization12.44B
LI vs NIO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LI vs. NIO commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LI is a Buy and NIO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (LI: $16.78 vs. NIO: $4.91)
Brand notoriety: LI: Not notable vs. NIO: Notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LI: 22% vs. NIO: 29%
Market capitalization -- LI: $16.94B vs. NIO: $12.44B
LI [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $16.94B. NIO’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $12.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.61T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $43.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NIO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIO is a better buy in the long-term than LI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NIO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LI is a better buy in the short-term than NIO.

Price Growth

LI (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +3.90% price change this week, while NIO (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

LI is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2026.

NIO is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-0.04% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LI($16.9B) has a higher market cap than NIO($12.4B). NIO YTD gains are higher at: 12.615 vs. LI (-30.054). LI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.62B vs. NIO (-22.99B). LI has more cash in the bank: 98.7B vs. NIO (24.1B). LI has less debt than NIO: LI (17.9B) vs NIO (27.6B). LI has higher revenues than NIO: LI (145B) vs NIO (69.4B).
LINIOLI / NIO
Capitalization16.9B12.4B136%
EBITDA9.62B-22.99B-42%
Gain YTD-30.05412.615-238%
P/E Ratio15.48N/A-
Revenue145B69.4B209%
Total Cash98.7B24.1B410%
Total Debt17.9B27.6B65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NIO: Fundamental Ratings
NIO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
11

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINIO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NIO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTCB21.230.06
+0.28%
First Trust Core Investment Grade ETF
SCEC25.510.07
+0.28%
Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF
QAT18.960.03
+0.16%
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
DSM6.01N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal
USRD33.99N/A
N/A
Themes US R&D Champions ETF

LI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LI has been loosely correlated with BYDDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LI jumps, then BYDDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LI
1D Price
Change %
LI100%
+0.54%
BYDDF - LI
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
XPEV - LI
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
BYDDY - LI
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
NIO - LI
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
ZK - LI
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

NIO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIO has been loosely correlated with BYDDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NIO jumps, then BYDDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIO
1D Price
Change %
NIO100%
+0.41%
BYDDF - NIO
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
XPEV - NIO
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
LI - NIO
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
BYDDY - NIO
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
ZK - NIO
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More