LHX
Price
$265.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
49.5B
4 days until earnings call
NOC
Price
$519.04
Change
-$4.79 (-0.91%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
74.7B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LHX vs NOC

Header iconLHX vs NOC Comparison
Open Charts LHX vs NOCBanner chart's image
L3Harris Technologies
Price$265.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$89.94K
Capitalization49.5B
Northrop Grumman
Price$519.04
Change-$4.79 (-0.91%)
Volume$874.06K
Capitalization74.7B
LHX vs NOC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LHX vs. NOC commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LHX is a Hold and NOC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (LHX: $265.51 vs. NOC: $519.04)
Brand notoriety: LHX: Not notable vs. NOC: Notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LHX: 6% vs. NOC: 107%
Market capitalization -- LHX: $49.5B vs. NOC: $74.7B
LHX [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $49.5B. NOC’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $74.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $279.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $20.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LHX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LHX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NOC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOC is a better buy in the long-term than LHX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LHX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LHX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NOC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOC is a better buy in the short-term than LHX.

Price Growth

LHX (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +2.30% price change this week, while NOC (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

LHX is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

NOC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+2.80% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOC($74.7B) has a higher market cap than LHX($49.5B). LHX has higher P/E ratio than NOC: LHX (31.41) vs NOC (20.48). LHX YTD gains are higher at: 27.587 vs. NOC (11.629). NOC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.5B vs. LHX (3.69B). NOC has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. LHX (517M). LHX has less debt than NOC: LHX (12.3B) vs NOC (16B). NOC has higher revenues than LHX: NOC (40.4B) vs LHX (21.2B).
LHXNOCLHX / NOC
Capitalization49.5B74.7B66%
EBITDA3.69B6.5B57%
Gain YTD27.58711.629237%
P/E Ratio31.4120.48153%
Revenue21.2B40.4B52%
Total Cash517M1.69B31%
Total Debt12.3B16B77%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LHX vs NOC: Fundamental Ratings
LHX
NOC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4441
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4120
SMR RATING
1..100
7539
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7387
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LHX's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (22) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

NOC's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as LHX (41) in the null industry. This means that NOC’s stock grew similarly to LHX’s over the last 12 months.

NOC's SMR Rating (39) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LHX (75) in the null industry. This means that NOC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LHX’s over the last 12 months.

LHX's Price Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOC (52) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOC’s over the last 12 months.

LHX's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as NOC (87) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX’s stock grew similarly to NOC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LHXNOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLSE23.500.04
+0.17%
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
PCMM50.770.08
+0.15%
BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF
FTEC203.93-0.13
-0.06%
Fidelity MSCI Information Tech ETF
NETL24.01-0.11
-0.46%
Fundamental Income Net Lease Rl Estt ETF
FFSM27.70-0.13
-0.46%
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF

LHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with GD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then GD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LHX
1D Price
Change %
LHX100%
N/A
GD - LHX
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
LMT - LHX
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
NOC - LHX
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
TXT - LHX
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
RTX - LHX
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

NOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been closely correlated with RTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then RTX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOC
1D Price
Change %
NOC100%
-0.91%
RTX - NOC
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
LMT - NOC
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
LHX - NOC
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GD - NOC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
KTOS - NOC
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More