Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LHCCX vs SHSAX
LHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LHCCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.46B vs. LHCCX (7.31M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: SHSAX (0.22) vs LHCCX (0.00). LHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: LHCCX (6 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). LHCCX (4.09) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: SHSAX (1000) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.39 vs. SHSAX (-11.81). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.23 vs. SHSAX (-8.30).
| LHCCX | SHSAX | LHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.09 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.09 | 1.09 | 375% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.674 | -0.817 | 572% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.31M | 6.46B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.39 | -11.81 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.87 | -7.36 | -107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.23 | -8.30 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement