Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LHCAX vs SHSAX
LHCAX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LHCAX vs. SHSAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LHCAX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.25B vs. LHCAX (7.8M). LHCAX pays higher dividends than SHSAX: LHCAX (0.31) vs SHSAX (0.23). LHCAX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: LHCAX (6 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). LHCAX (3.34) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). LHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). LHCAX initial investment is less costly to investors than SHSAX (5%) vs SHSAX (5%). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCAX: SHSAX (1000) vs LHCAX (1500). LHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.25 vs. SHSAX (-16.25). LHCAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.58 vs. SHSAX (-13.34).
| LHCAX | SHSAX | LHCAX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.09 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.34 | 1.09 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.549 | -3.555 | -100% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 110% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.8M | 6.25B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.23 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.25 | -16.25 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.94 | 0.40 | 4,747% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.58 | -13.34 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement