Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGRCX vs RGACX
LGRCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGRCX vs RGACX
Loomis Sayles Growth C
Price$23.49
Change-$0.40 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.49B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.29
Change-$1.00 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.64B
LGRCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGRCX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGRCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. LGRCX (17.5B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGRCX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGRCX (0.00). LGRCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGRCX (22 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LGRCX (1.67) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LGRCX (10.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRCX: RGACX (250) vs LGRCX (2500). LGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.59 vs. RGACX (11.81). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 38.00 vs. LGRCX (26.77).
| LGRCX | RGACX | LGRCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.94 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.94 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.901 | 12.918 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5B | 330B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.59 | 11.81 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.10 | 43.79 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.77 | 38.00 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.43 | 93.80 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement