LGO
Price
$1.33
Change
+$0.03 (+2.31%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
112.87M
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WWR
Price
$0.97
Change
-$0.02 (-2.02%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
116.81M
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGO vs WWR

Header iconLGO vs WWR Comparison
Open Charts LGO vs WWRBanner chart's image
Largo
Price$1.33
Change+$0.03 (+2.31%)
Volume$168.6K
Capitalization112.87M
Westwater Resources
Price$0.97
Change-$0.02 (-2.02%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization116.81M
LGO vs WWR Comparison Chart in %
LGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGO vs. WWR commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGO is a Buy and WWR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (LGO: $1.30 vs. WWR: $0.99)
Brand notoriety: LGO and WWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGO: 297% vs. WWR: 84%
Market capitalization -- LGO: $112.87M vs. WWR: $114.3M
LGO [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $112.87M. WWR’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $114.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWWR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WWR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WWR is a better buy in the long-term than LGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LGO and WWR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LGO (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.26% price change this week, while WWR (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -18.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -5.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGO is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2026.

WWR is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-5.42% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WWR($117M) and LGO($113M) have the same market capitalization . LGO YTD gains are higher at: 38.711 vs. WWR (32.000). WWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -12.56M vs. LGO (-13.83M). WWR has more cash in the bank: 12.9M vs. LGO (7.85M). WWR has less debt than LGO: WWR (10.1M) vs LGO (106M). LGO has higher revenues than WWR: LGO (112M) vs WWR (0).
LGOWWRLGO / WWR
Capitalization113M117M97%
EBITDA-13.83M-12.56M110%
Gain YTD38.71132.000121%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue112M0-
Total Cash7.85M12.9M61%
Total Debt106M10.1M1,050%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGO vs WWR: Fundamental Ratings
LGO
WWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7415
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WWR's Valuation (28) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGO (75) in the null industry. This means that WWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGO’s over the last 12 months.

WWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as LGO (100) in the null industry. This means that WWR’s stock grew similarly to LGO’s over the last 12 months.

WWR's SMR Rating (95) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as LGO (97) in the null industry. This means that WWR’s stock grew similarly to LGO’s over the last 12 months.

WWR's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as LGO (54) in the null industry. This means that WWR’s stock grew similarly to LGO’s over the last 12 months.

LGO's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as WWR (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that LGO’s stock grew similarly to WWR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGOWWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EBYH0.18N/A
N/A
E-Buy Home Inc.
MAANF0.30N/A
N/A
Maanshan Iron & Steel Ltd.
SKYZF0.58N/A
N/A
Sky City Entertainment Group Ltd.
EMBVF11.42N/A
N/A
Arca Continental SAB de CV
POSC1.70-0.12
-6.59%
Positron Corp.

LGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGO has been loosely correlated with ELBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGO jumps, then ELBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGO
1D Price
Change %
LGO100%
+7.44%
ELBM - LGO
49%
Loosely correlated
+6.41%
WWR - LGO
43%
Loosely correlated
+4.21%
CRML - LGO
39%
Loosely correlated
+20.25%
LITM - LGO
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
IONR - LGO
36%
Loosely correlated
+4.17%
More

WWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWR has been loosely correlated with CRML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WWR jumps, then CRML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWR
1D Price
Change %
WWR100%
+4.21%
CRML - WWR
48%
Loosely correlated
+20.25%
LAC - WWR
43%
Loosely correlated
+8.61%
LGO - WWR
43%
Loosely correlated
+7.44%
NVA - WWR
42%
Loosely correlated
+8.03%
ATLX - WWR
35%
Loosely correlated
+5.92%
More