LGO
Price
$0.98
Change
-$0.12 (-10.91%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
91.53M
127 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NAK
Price
$1.73
Change
-$0.10 (-5.46%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.02B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGO vs NAK

Header iconLGO vs NAK Comparison
Open Charts LGO vs NAKBanner chart's image
Largo
Price$0.98
Change-$0.12 (-10.91%)
Volume$6.93K
Capitalization91.53M
Northern Dynasty Minerals
Price$1.73
Change-$0.10 (-5.46%)
Volume$31.62K
Capitalization1.02B
LGO vs NAK Comparison Chart in %
LGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NAK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGO vs. NAK commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGO is a Hold and NAK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LGO: $1.10 vs. NAK: $1.83)
Brand notoriety: LGO and NAK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGO: 35% vs. NAK: 33%
Market capitalization -- LGO: $80.87M vs. NAK: $956.95M
LGO [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $80.87M. NAK’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $956.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNAK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAK is a better buy in the long-term than LGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • NAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAK is a better buy in the short-term than LGO.

Price Growth

LGO (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.78% price change this week, while NAK (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +167.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGO is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2026.

NAK is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.70% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAK($1.02B) has a higher market cap than LGO($91.5M). NAK YTD gains are higher at: 214.703 vs. LGO (-36.047). LGO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -16.66M vs. NAK (-78.34M). NAK has more cash in the bank: 25.2M vs. LGO (5.62M). NAK has less debt than LGO: NAK (3.42M) vs LGO (95.1M). LGO has higher revenues than NAK: LGO (109M) vs NAK (0).
LGONAKLGO / NAK
Capitalization91.5M1.02B9%
EBITDA-16.66M-78.34M21%
Gain YTD-36.047214.703-17%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue109M0-
Total Cash5.62M25.2M22%
Total Debt95.1M3.42M2,782%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGO vs NAK: Fundamental Ratings
LGO
NAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
9598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9135
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGO's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as NAK (82) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that LGO’s stock grew similarly to NAK’s over the last 12 months.

NAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGO (100) in the null industry. This means that NAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGO’s over the last 12 months.

LGO's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as NAK (98) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that LGO’s stock grew similarly to NAK’s over the last 12 months.

NAK's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGO (91) in the null industry. This means that NAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGO’s over the last 12 months.

LGO's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as NAK (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that LGO’s stock grew similarly to NAK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGONAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NAK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GWTR0.040.01
+25.00%
Global Water Technologies, Inc.
AAFRF4.250.10
+2.36%
Airtel Africa Plc
NVYTF0.51N/A
N/A
Novacyt Clamart
ASPHF9.32N/A
N/A
ASCENTAGE PHARMA GROUP
MARZF0.62-0.01
-1.01%
Marston's plc.

LGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGO has been loosely correlated with ELBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGO jumps, then ELBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGO
1D Price
Change %
LGO100%
-3.51%
ELBM - LGO
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NMG - LGO
41%
Loosely correlated
+12.19%
WWR - LGO
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
UAMY - LGO
37%
Loosely correlated
-5.58%
CRML - LGO
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
More

NAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAK has been loosely correlated with UAMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NAK jumps, then UAMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAK
1D Price
Change %
NAK100%
+1.10%
UAMY - NAK
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.58%
ALM - NAK
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
TMQ - NAK
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
CGMLF - NAK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGO - NAK
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
More