LGO
Price
$1.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
95.16M
59 days until earnings call
LITM
Price
$3.76
Change
+$0.03 (+0.80%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
29.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGO vs LITM

Header iconLGO vs LITM Comparison
Open Charts LGO vs LITMBanner chart's image
Largo
Price$1.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$178.33K
Capitalization95.16M
Snow Lake Resources
Price$3.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.80%)
Volume$137.83K
Capitalization29.42M
LGO vs LITM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGO vs. LITM commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGO is a Hold and LITM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LGO: $1.49 vs. LITM: $3.76)
Brand notoriety: LGO and LITM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGO: 110% vs. LITM: 41%
Market capitalization -- LGO: $95.16M vs. LITM: $29.42M
LGO [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $95.16M. LITM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $29.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLITM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LITM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LITM is a better buy in the long-term than LGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LITM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LITM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LGO is a better buy in the short-term than LITM.

Price Growth

LGO (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.93% price change this week, while LITM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGO($95.2M) has a higher market cap than LITM($29.4M). LGO YTD gains are higher at: -13.372 vs. LITM (-69.872).
LGOLITMLGO / LITM
Capitalization95.2M29.4M324%
EBITDA-16.66MN/A-
Gain YTD-13.372-69.87219%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue109MN/A-
Total Cash5.62MN/A-
Total Debt95.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGO: Fundamental Ratings
LGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
10

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGOLITM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LITM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUOPY17.220.72
+4.37%
Sumco Corp.
PBAM57.490.29
+0.50%
Private Bancorp of America, Inc.
KENS0.37N/A
N/A
Kenilworth Systems Corp.
RMTG0.07N/A
N/A
Regenerative Medical Technology Group Inc.
CMSQF26.00N/A
N/A
Computershare Ltd.

LGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGO has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGO jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGO
1D Price
Change %
LGO100%
N/A
TECK - LGO
40%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
LAC - LGO
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
RIO - LGO
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
VALE - LGO
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
VZLA - LGO
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
More

LITM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITM has been loosely correlated with HANCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LITM jumps, then HANCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITM
1D Price
Change %
LITM100%
+0.80%
HANCF - LITM
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NMG - LITM
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
TECK - LITM
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.70%
LGO - LITM
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGXPF - LITM
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.78%
More