LGO
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
105.49M
9 days until earnings call
LISMF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
33.63M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGO vs LISMF

Header iconLGO vs LISMF Comparison
Open Charts LGO vs LISMFBanner chart's image
Largo
Price$1.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$381
Capitalization105.49M
Lithium South Dev
Price$0.16
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$295.78K
Capitalization33.63M
LGO vs LISMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LISMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGO vs. LISMF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGO is a StrongBuy and LISMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LGO: $1.60 vs. LISMF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: LGO and LISMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGO: 0% vs. LISMF: 221%
Market capitalization -- LGO: $105.49M vs. LISMF: $33.63M
LGO [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $105.49M. LISMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $33.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLISMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LISMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LISMF is a better buy in the long-term than LGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LISMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LISMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LGO is a better buy in the short-term than LISMF.

Price Growth

LGO (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.11% price change this week, while LISMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGO($105M) has a higher market cap than LISMF($33.6M). LISMF YTD gains are higher at: 128.571 vs. LGO (-6.977). LGO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.82M vs. LISMF (-10.32M). LGO has more cash in the bank: 42.7M vs. LISMF (5.94M). LISMF has less debt than LGO: LISMF (261K) vs LGO (76.5M). LGO has higher revenues than LISMF: LGO (199M) vs LISMF (0).
LGOLISMFLGO / LISMF
Capitalization105M33.6M313%
EBITDA3.82M-10.32M-37%
Gain YTD-6.977128.571-5%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue199M0-
Total Cash42.7M5.94M719%
Total Debt76.5M261K29,310%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGO vs LISMF: Fundamental Ratings
LGO
LISMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LISMF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGO (74). This means that LISMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGO’s over the last 12 months.

LISMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LGO (100). This means that LISMF’s stock grew similarly to LGO’s over the last 12 months.

LGO's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as LISMF (97). This means that LGO’s stock grew similarly to LISMF’s over the last 12 months.

LISMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as LGO (49). This means that LISMF’s stock grew similarly to LGO’s over the last 12 months.

LGO's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as LISMF (100). This means that LGO’s stock grew similarly to LISMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGOLISMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LISMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWCBF0.060.02
+44.22%
NEW WORLD COBALT LTD.
CDEVY4.970.26
+5.63%
City Developments, Ltd.
AGPYF0.16N/A
N/A
Agile Group Holdings Limited
GBBFF0.02N/A
N/A
Granada Gold Mine Inc.
KMTUF35.43-1.28
-3.49%
Komatsu Ltd.

LGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGO has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGO jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGO
1D Price
Change %
LGO100%
N/A
LAC - LGO
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.69%
LAR - LGO
39%
Loosely correlated
+5.90%
TECK - LGO
37%
Loosely correlated
-6.04%
FCX - LGO
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
UUUU - LGO
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More

LISMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LISMF and LTSRF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LISMF and LTSRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LISMF
1D Price
Change %
LISMF100%
N/A
LTSRF - LISMF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.26%
UROY - LISMF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
HANCF - LISMF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NICLF - LISMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGO - LISMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More