Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGMCX vs RIEBX
LGMCX vs RIEBX Comparison
Open Charts LGMCX vs RIEBX
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation C
Price$24.66
Change+$0.07 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.89B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2E
Price$26.85
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.73B
LGMCX vs RIEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGMCX vs. RIEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGMCX is a Buy and RIEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIEBX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. LGMCX (2.89B). RIEBX pays higher dividends than LGMCX: RIEBX (3.23) vs LGMCX (0.29). LGMCX was incepted earlier than RIEBX: LGMCX (19 years) vs RIEBX (11 years). LGMCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RIEBX (1.07). RIEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LGMCX (22.00). RIEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMCX: RIEBX (250) vs LGMCX (2500). RIEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. LGMCX (3.96). RIEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.53 vs. LGMCX (-1.62).
| LGMCX | RIEBX | LGMCX / RIEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.615 | 11.508 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 136B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 3.23 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.96 | 13.02 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.41 | 25.27 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.62 | 38.53 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.00 | 46.68 | 58% |