Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGMCX vs RIDAX
LGMCX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts LGMCX vs RIDAX
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation C
Price$25.41
Change-$0.31 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.8B
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1
Price$27.41
Change-$0.20 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.2B
LGMCX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGMCX vs. RIDAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGMCX is a StrongBuy and RIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. LGMCX (2.81B). RIDAX pays higher dividends than LGMCX: RIDAX (2.89) vs LGMCX (0.27). LGMCX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: LGMCX (20 years) vs RIDAX (23 years). LGMCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RIDAX (1.34). RIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMCX: RIDAX (250) vs LGMCX (2500). RIDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.80 vs. LGMCX (1.56). RIDAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.52 vs. LGMCX (-3.75).
| LGMCX | RIDAX | LGMCX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.34 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.34 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.198 | 15.476 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 140B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 2.89 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.56 | 10.80 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.98 | 28.18 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.75 | 34.52 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.62 | 53.97 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement