Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLSX vs RGACX
LGLSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLSX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$56.18
Change+$0.09 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
LGLSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLSX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. LGLSX (8.05B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLSX (0.00). LGLSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLSX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and LGLSX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLSX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. RGACX (12.22). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. LGLSX (34.95).
| LGLSX | RGACX | LGLSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.94 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.94 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.874 | 17.183 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.05B | 337B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 12.22 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 114.18 | 71.26 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.95 | 45.63 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 161.67 | 111.15 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement