Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLRX vs RGACX
LGLRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLRX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$52.40
Change+$0.72 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.9B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
LGLRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLRX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLRX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LGLRX (7.9B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLRX (0.00). LGLRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLRX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LGLRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLRX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.49 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. LGLRX (31.63).
| LGLRX | RGACX | LGLRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.94 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.94 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.824 | 15.516 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.9B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.49 | 17.83 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.41 | 58.53 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.63 | 40.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.14 | 95.93 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement