Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLIX vs RGACX
LGLIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLIX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders I
Price$59.17
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
LGLIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLIX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. LGLIX (8.05B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLIX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLIX (0.00). LGLIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLIX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LGLIX (0.65). LGLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLIX: RGACX (250) vs LGLIX (1000000). LGLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.63 vs. RGACX (12.22). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. LGLIX (38.15).
| LGLIX | RGACX | LGLIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.102 | 17.183 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.05B | 337B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.63 | 12.22 | 283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 115.79 | 71.26 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.15 | 45.63 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.18 | 111.15 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement