Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLFX vs RGACX
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLFX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$52.71
Change-$1.96 (-3.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.09B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$76.64
Change-$9.33 (-10.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLFX vs. RGACX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLFX (7.09B). LGLFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGLFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLFX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLFX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.76 vs. RGACX (2.06). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 11.01 vs. LGLFX (9.89).
| LGLFX | RGACX | LGLFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.93 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.774 | -1.046 | 265% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.09B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.76 | 2.06 | 327% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.15 | 42.58 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.89 | 11.01 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.08 | 113.97 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers