Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLFX vs RGACX
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLFX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$58.10
Change-$0.11 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLFX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLFX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLFX (7.96B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLFX (0.00). LGLFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLFX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLFX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.60 vs. RGACX (11.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. LGLFX (24.65).
| LGLFX | RGACX | LGLFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.017 | 17.655 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.96B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.60 | 11.01 | 269% |
| Returns for 3 years | 116.71 | 70.57 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | 37.85 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.68 | 96.78 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement