Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLFX vs RGACX
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLFX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$57.29
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.84B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
LGLFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLFX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLFX (7.84B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLFX (0.00). LGLFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLFX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than LGLFX (0.75). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LGLFX (0) vs RGACX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. RGACX (5.61). LGLFX (20.76) and RGACX (20.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LGLFX | RGACX | LGLFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.93 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.372 | 8.807 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.84B | 339B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | 5.61 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 126.71 | 64.57 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.76 | 20.41 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.55 | 90.45 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers