Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLAX vs RGEBX
LGLAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LGLAX vs RGEBX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$53.86
Change-$0.89 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.8B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.85
Change-$0.83 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
LGLAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLAX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLAX (7.8B). LGLAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGLAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LGLAX (15 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than LGLAX (0.90). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: RGEBX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. RGEBX (8.68). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.94 vs. LGLAX (15.70).
| LGLAX | RGEBX | LGLAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.08 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.08 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.167 | 1.552 | 11% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.8B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.33 | 8.68 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.47 | 53.46 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.70 | 16.94 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 164.41 | 111.87 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers