Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLAX vs RGACX
LGLAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LGLAX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$55.53
Change+$0.80 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
LGLAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLAX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LGLAX (8B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: RGACX (0.07) vs LGLAX (0.00). LGLAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LGLAX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and LGLAX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: RGACX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.87 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. LGLAX (34.53).
| LGLAX | RGACX | LGLAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.94 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.94 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.046 | 15.516 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.87 | 17.83 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.91 | 58.53 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.53 | 40.02 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.46 | 95.93 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement