Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGH vs RECS
LGH vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LGH vs RECS
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
Price$60.08
Change+$0.43 (+0.72%)
Volume$8.35K
Net Assets551.7M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.98
Change+$0.24 (+0.60%)
Volume$662.45K
Net Assets4.1B
LGH vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGH vs. RECS commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGH is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.1B vs. LGH (552M). RECS (15.482) and LGH (15.385) have matching annual dividend yield . LGH was incepted earlier than RECS: LGH (6 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LGH (1.06). LGH has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| LGH | RECS | LGH / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 15.385 | 15.482 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 552M | 4.1B | 13% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.15 | 707% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 49.00 | 308% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.60 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LGH | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 87% | 17 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 71% | 9 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LGH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGH has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGH jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGH | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| GS - LGH | 75% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| AMZN - LGH | 74% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| EMR - LGH | 74% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| MS - LGH | 74% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| TRMB - LGH | 73% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||