Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGH vs RECS
LGH vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LGH vs RECS
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
Price$56.68
Change+$0.33 (+0.59%)
Volume$29.48K
Net Assets512.95M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$38.19
Change+$0.14 (+0.37%)
Volume$411.03K
Net Assets3.21B
LGH vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGH vs. RECS commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGH is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.21B vs. LGH (513M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LGH: RECS (10.312) vs LGH (8.848). LGH was incepted earlier than RECS: LGH (6 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LGH (1.06). LGH has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| LGH | RECS | LGH / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.848 | 10.312 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 513M | 3.21B | 16% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.15 | 707% |
| Turnover | 114.00 | 49.00 | 233% |
| Yield | 0.38 | 0.65 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LGH | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 74% | 20 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LGH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGH has been closely correlated with TT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGH jumps, then TT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGH | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| TT - LGH | 70% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| VRT - LGH | 67% Closely correlated | +5.04% | ||
| CARR - LGH | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| CDNS - LGH | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| TER - LGH | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.81% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||