LGGNY
Price
$17.78
Change
-$0.10 (-0.56%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
20.18B
PNXPF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.02 (-28.57%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGGNY vs PNXPF

Header iconLGGNY vs PNXPF Comparison
Open Charts LGGNY vs PNXPFBanner chart's image
Legal & General Group
Price$17.78
Change-$0.10 (-0.56%)
Volume$29.02K
Capitalization20.18B
Planet Ventures
Price$0.05
Change-$0.02 (-28.57%)
Volume$949.22K
Capitalization11.24M
LGGNY vs PNXPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGGNY vs. PNXPF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGGNY is a StrongBuy and PNXPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (LGGNY: $17.78 vs. PNXPF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: LGGNY and PNXPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGGNY: 44% vs. PNXPF: 289%
Market capitalization -- LGGNY: $20.18B vs. PNXPF: $11.24M
LGGNY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $20.18B. PNXPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGGNY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePNXPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LGGNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PNXPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGGNY is a better buy in the long-term than PNXPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGGNY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNXPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGGNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PNXPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LGGNY is a better buy in the short-term than PNXPF.

Price Growth

LGGNY (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.46% price change this week, while PNXPF (@Investment Managers) price change was -16.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGGNY($20.2B) has a higher market cap than PNXPF($11.2M). LGGNY has higher P/E ratio than PNXPF: LGGNY (59.87) vs PNXPF (2.31). PNXPF YTD gains are higher at: 115.602 vs. LGGNY (30.429).
LGGNYPNXPFLGGNY / PNXPF
Capitalization20.2B11.2M180,357%
EBITDAN/A6.61M-
Gain YTD30.429115.60226%
P/E Ratio59.872.312,596%
RevenueN/A928K-
Total CashN/A13.9M-
Total DebtN/A192K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGGNY vs PNXPF: Fundamental Ratings
LGGNY
PNXPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2384
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
9716
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2786
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PNXPF (77). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew significantly faster than PNXPF’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNXPF (100). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNXPF’s over the last 12 months.

PNXPF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGGNY (97). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew significantly faster than LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

PNXPF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNY (45). This means that PNXPF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNXPF (86). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNXPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGGNYPNXPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRGAY34.34N/A
N/A
Borregaard AS
BQCNF118.46N/A
N/A
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise
CLYYF0.41N/A
N/A
Celyad Oncology SA
ASUUF11.59N/A
N/A
A SPAC II Acquisition Corp.
CABPF0.68N/A
N/A
CAB PMTS HLDGS LTD.

LGGNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGGNY has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGGNY jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNY
1D Price
Change %
LGGNY100%
-0.56%
APAM - LGGNY
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
BN - LGGNY
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
JHG - LGGNY
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
BAM - LGGNY
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
PAX - LGGNY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
More

PNXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNXPF and RMGOF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNXPF and RMGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNXPF
1D Price
Change %
PNXPF100%
-28.14%
RMGOF - PNXPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFFFF - PNXPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNGPF - PNXPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
RHCO - PNXPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
LGGNY - PNXPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
More