LGGNF
Price
$3.52
Change
+$0.05 (+1.44%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
19.71B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSLX
Price
$21.48
Change
+$0.21 (+0.99%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.03B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGGNF vs TSLX

Header iconLGGNF vs TSLX Comparison
Open Charts LGGNF vs TSLXBanner chart's image
Legal & General Group
Price$3.52
Change+$0.05 (+1.44%)
Volume$1.82K
Capitalization19.71B
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
Price$21.48
Change+$0.21 (+0.99%)
Volume$160.8K
Capitalization2.03B
LGGNF vs TSLX Comparison Chart in %
LGGNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGGNF vs. TSLX commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGGNF is a Hold and TSLX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LGGNF: $3.52 vs. TSLX: $21.48)
Brand notoriety: LGGNF and TSLX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGGNF: 22% vs. TSLX: 33%
Market capitalization -- LGGNF: $19.71B vs. TSLX: $2.03B
LGGNF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $19.71B. TSLX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGGNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTSLX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LGGNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TSLX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSLX is a better buy in the long-term than LGGNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGGNF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSLX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGGNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TSLX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LGGNF is a better buy in the short-term than TSLX.

Price Growth

LGGNF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.36% price change this week, while TSLX (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

TSLX is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGGNF($19.7B) has a higher market cap than TSLX($2.03B). LGGNF has higher P/E ratio than TSLX: LGGNF (59.02) vs TSLX (10.48). LGGNF YTD gains are higher at: 24.276 vs. TSLX (7.897). TSLX has less debt than LGGNF: TSLX (1.83B) vs LGGNF (4.82B). LGGNF has higher revenues than TSLX: LGGNF (18.6B) vs TSLX (241M).
LGGNFTSLXLGGNF / TSLX
Capitalization19.7B2.03B970%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.2767.897307%
P/E Ratio59.0210.48563%
Revenue18.6B241M7,718%
Total Cash12.4BN/A-
Total Debt4.82B1.83B263%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGGNF vs TSLX: Fundamental Ratings
LGGNF
TSLX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5092
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9923
SMR RATING
1..100
9620
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2246
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as TSLX (19). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGGNF (99). This means that TSLX’s stock grew significantly faster than LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGGNF (96). This means that TSLX’s stock grew significantly faster than LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as TSLX (59). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as TSLX (46). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGGNFTSLX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGGNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACAAX40.820.11
+0.27%
Alger Capital Appreciation A
RRMVX31.390.08
+0.26%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value R
BSCMX20.500.04
+0.20%
Brandes Small Cap Value I
JEEFX17.450.03
+0.17%
JHancock Infrastructure C
BFSIX26.26N/A
N/A
BFS Equity Institutional

LGGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGGNF and LGGNY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGGNF and LGGNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNF
1D Price
Change %
LGGNF100%
+1.44%
LGGNY - LGGNF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
SCM - LGGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
CSWC - LGGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
TSLX - LGGNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
IGIFF - LGGNF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
More

TSLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSLX has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSLX jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSLX
1D Price
Change %
TSLX100%
+0.99%
ARCC - TSLX
81%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
BCSF - TSLX
80%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
GSBD - TSLX
80%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
GBDC - TSLX
80%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
SLRC - TSLX
79%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
More