LGGNF
Price
$3.18
Change
+$0.04 (+1.27%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
17.86B
PIAC
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGGNF vs PIAC

Header iconLGGNF vs PIAC Comparison
Open Charts LGGNF vs PIACBanner chart's image
Legal & General Group
Price$3.18
Change+$0.04 (+1.27%)
Volume$42.81K
Capitalization17.86B
Princeton Capital
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$19K
Capitalization7.23M
LGGNF vs PIAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LGGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGGNF vs. PIAC commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGGNF is a Hold and PIAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (LGGNF: $3.18 vs. PIAC: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: LGGNF and PIAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGGNF: 406% vs. PIAC: 127%
Market capitalization -- LGGNF: $17.86B vs. PIAC: $7.23M
LGGNF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.86B. PIAC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $171.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGGNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePIAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LGGNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PIAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGGNF is a better buy in the long-term than PIAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGGNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGGNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PIAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIAC is a better buy in the short-term than LGGNF.

Price Growth

LGGNF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.59% price change this week, while PIAC (@Investment Managers) price change was +20.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGGNF($17.9B) has a higher market cap than PIAC($7.23M). LGGNF YTD gains are higher at: 12.261 vs. PIAC (-53.398). LGGNF has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. PIAC (188K). PIAC has less debt than LGGNF: PIAC (26.8K) vs LGGNF (4.82B). LGGNF has higher revenues than PIAC: LGGNF (18.6B) vs PIAC (-4.36M).
LGGNFPIACLGGNF / PIAC
Capitalization17.9B7.23M247,614%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.261-53.398-23%
P/E Ratio53.17N/A-
Revenue18.6B-4.36M-426,160%
Total Cash12.4B188K6,595,745%
Total Debt4.82B26.8K17,977,612%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGGNF vs PIAC: Fundamental Ratings
LGGNF
PIAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
9797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6265
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3351
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIAC's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNF (6). This means that PIAC’s stock grew similarly to LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as PIAC (100). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to PIAC’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as PIAC (97). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to PIAC’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as PIAC (65). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to PIAC’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as PIAC (51). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to PIAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGGNFPIAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NTIC7.740.05
+0.72%
Northern Technologies International Corp
JOUT40.810.03
+0.07%
Johnson Outdoors
WT13.43-0.31
-2.26%
WisdomTree
AIZ211.17-5.34
-2.47%
Assurant
CWD2.08-0.30
-12.61%
CaliberCos Inc

LGGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGGNF and LGGNY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGGNF and LGGNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNF
1D Price
Change %
LGGNF100%
+1.05%
LGGNY - LGGNF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
IGIFF - LGGNF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVSBF - LGGNF
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
JBAXY - LGGNF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
IDKFF - LGGNF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.69%
More

PIAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIAC has been loosely correlated with NOAH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIAC jumps, then NOAH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIAC
1D Price
Change %
PIAC100%
N/A
NOAH - PIAC
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
EQBBF - PIAC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNF - PIAC
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
ONEXF - PIAC
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
LGGNY - PIAC
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More