LGGNF
Price
$3.18
Change
+$0.04 (+1.27%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
17.78B
MGPUF
Price
$3.70
Change
+$0.10 (+2.78%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
8.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGGNF vs MGPUF

Header iconLGGNF vs MGPUF Comparison
Open Charts LGGNF vs MGPUFBanner chart's image
Legal & General Group
Price$3.18
Change+$0.04 (+1.27%)
Volume$42.81K
Capitalization17.78B
M&G
Price$3.70
Change+$0.10 (+2.78%)
Volume$495
Capitalization8.3B
LGGNF vs MGPUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LGGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGGNF vs. MGPUF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGGNF is a Hold and MGPUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LGGNF: $3.18 vs. MGPUF: $3.70)
Brand notoriety: LGGNF and MGPUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGGNF: 406% vs. MGPUF: 8%
Market capitalization -- LGGNF: $17.78B vs. MGPUF: $8.3B
LGGNF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.78B. MGPUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGGNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGPUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LGGNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGPUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGPUF is a better buy in the long-term than LGGNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGGNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGPUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGGNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MGPUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGPUF is a better buy in the short-term than LGGNF.

Price Growth

LGGNF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.59% price change this week, while MGPUF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGGNF($17.8B) has a higher market cap than MGPUF($8.3B). LGGNF has higher P/E ratio than MGPUF: LGGNF (54.07) vs MGPUF (31.78). MGPUF YTD gains are higher at: 47.251 vs. LGGNF (12.261). LGGNF has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. MGPUF (4.84B). LGGNF has less debt than MGPUF: LGGNF (4.82B) vs MGPUF (6.91B). LGGNF has higher revenues than MGPUF: LGGNF (18.6B) vs MGPUF (11.3B).
LGGNFMGPUFLGGNF / MGPUF
Capitalization17.8B8.3B215%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.26147.25126%
P/E Ratio54.0731.78170%
Revenue18.6B11.3B165%
Total Cash12.4B4.84B256%
Total Debt4.82B6.91B70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGGNF vs MGPUF: Fundamental Ratings
LGGNF
MGPUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8447
SMR RATING
1..100
9798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3311
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPUF (10). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to MGPUF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGGNF (84). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPUF (98). This means that LGGNF’s stock grew similarly to MGPUF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNF (62). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNF (33). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to LGGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGGNFMGPUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEMB52.790.31
+0.59%
Janus Henderson Em Mkts Dbt Hrd Ccy ETF
FTBD49.960.29
+0.58%
Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF
IEUR66.830.35
+0.53%
iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF
BIT13.570.02
+0.15%
BLACKROCK MULTI-SECTOR Income TRUST
APLY13.57-0.01
-0.07%
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF

LGGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGGNF and LGGNY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGGNF and LGGNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNF
1D Price
Change %
LGGNF100%
+1.05%
LGGNY - LGGNF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
IGIFF - LGGNF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVSBF - LGGNF
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
JBAXY - LGGNF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
IDKFF - LGGNF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.69%
More

MGPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPUF and SRXXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPUF and SRXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPUF
1D Price
Change %
MGPUF100%
N/A
SRXXF - MGPUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBUC - MGPUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
LBGUF - MGPUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - MGPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.99%
LGGNF - MGPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More