Ad is loading...
LGFRY
Price
Loading...
Change
Loading...
Updated
Loading...
SNLAY
Price
Loading...
Change
Loading...
Updated
Loading...
Ad is loading...

LGFRY vs SNLAY

Header iconLGFRY vs SNLAY Comparison
Open Charts LGFRY vs SNLAYBanner chart's image
Longfor Group Holdings
PriceLoading...
ChangeLoading...
Volume$23.99K
CapitalizationN/A
Sino Land
PriceLoading...
ChangeLoading...
Volume$5.13K
CapitalizationN/A
LGFRY vs SNLAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LGFRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGFRY vs. SNLAY commentary
Nov 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGFRY is a StrongSell and SNLAY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 24, 2024
Stock price -- (LGFRY: $14.47 vs. SNLAY: $5.06)
Brand notoriety: LGFRY and SNLAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGFRY: 96% vs. SNLAY: 159%
Market capitalization -- LGFRY: $16.88B vs. SNLAY: $10.01B
LGFRY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $16.88B. SNLAY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $10.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGFRY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNLAY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LGFRY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SNLAY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNLAY is a better buy in the long-term than LGFRY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGFRY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LGFRY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LGFRY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -9.66% price change this week, while SNLAY (@Real Estate Development) price change was -0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.07% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGFRY($16.9B) has a higher market cap than SNLAY($10B). SNLAY has higher P/E ratio than LGFRY: SNLAY (18.35) vs LGFRY (4.39). SNLAY YTD gains are higher at: 0.062 vs. LGFRY (-6.384). LGFRY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 47.5B vs. SNLAY (4.95B). LGFRY has higher revenues than SNLAY: LGFRY (251B) vs SNLAY (11B).
LGFRYSNLAYLGFRY / SNLAY
Capitalization16.9B10B169%
EBITDA47.5B4.95B960%
Gain YTD-6.3840.062-10,217%
P/E Ratio4.3918.3524%
Revenue251B11B2,282%
Total CashN/A44.4B-
Total DebtN/A5.04B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGFRY vs SNLAY: Fundamental Ratings
LGFRY
SNLAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
686
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2830
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNLAY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGFRY (95). This means that SNLAY’s stock grew significantly faster than LGFRY’s over the last 12 months.

SNLAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LGFRY (100). This means that SNLAY’s stock grew similarly to LGFRY’s over the last 12 months.

SNLAY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as LGFRY (16). This means that SNLAY’s stock grew similarly to LGFRY’s over the last 12 months.

LGFRY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SNLAY (57). This means that LGFRY’s stock grew similarly to SNLAY’s over the last 12 months.

LGFRY's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as SNLAY (30). This means that LGFRY’s stock grew similarly to SNLAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGFRY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LGFRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME28.450.88
+3.19%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X94339.4900001995.703100
+2.16%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL229.000.72
+0.32%
Apple
SPY590.500.20
+0.03%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA342.03-3.97
-1.15%
Tesla

LGFRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGFRY has been closely correlated with HLPPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGFRY jumps, then HLPPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGFRY
1D Price
Change %
LGFRY100%
-0.46%
HLPPY - LGFRY
70%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
CAOVY - LGFRY
70%
Closely correlated
-5.42%
HLDCY - LGFRY
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
XIN - LGFRY
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
HYSNY - LGFRY
41%
Loosely correlated
+4.50%
More

SNLAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNLAY and GZTGF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNLAY and GZTGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNLAY
1D Price
Change %
SNLAY100%
+1.20%
GZTGF - SNLAY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGFRY - SNLAY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
BEKE - SNLAY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
HYSNY - SNLAY
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
NMEHF - SNLAY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More