LGDDF
Price
$21.66
Change
-$0.11 (-0.51%)
Updated
Jan 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.16B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TNLIY
Price
$6.30
Change
-$0.02 (-0.32%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGDDF vs TNLIY

Header iconLGDDF vs TNLIY Comparison
Open Charts LGDDF vs TNLIYBanner chart's image
LAGARDERE SA
Price$21.66
Change-$0.11 (-0.51%)
Volume$2.25K
Capitalization3.16B
Trainline
Price$6.30
Change-$0.02 (-0.32%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.12B
LGDDF vs TNLIY Comparison Chart in %
LGDDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TNLIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGDDF vs. TNLIY commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGDDF is a Hold and TNLIY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (LGDDF: $21.66 vs. TNLIY: $6.30)
Brand notoriety: LGDDF and TNLIY are both not notable
LGDDF represents the Specialty Stores, while TNLIY is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGDDF: 192% vs. TNLIY: 73%
Market capitalization -- LGDDF: $3.16B vs. TNLIY: $1.12B
LGDDF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $3.16B. TNLIY’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $48.89B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $167.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $17.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGDDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNLIY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LGDDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TNLIY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGDDF is a better buy in the long-term than TNLIY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGDDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNLIY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGDDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TNLIY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TNLIY is a better buy in the short-term than LGDDF.

Price Growth

LGDDF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.52% price change this week, while TNLIY (@Consumer Sundries) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.21%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.71% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Consumer Sundries (-4.05% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGDDF($3.16B) has a higher market cap than TNLIY($1.12B). TNLIY has higher P/E ratio than LGDDF: TNLIY (14.01) vs LGDDF (12.48). TNLIY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. LGDDF (-2.212). LGDDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. TNLIY (126M). LGDDF has more cash in the bank: 396M vs. TNLIY (121M). TNLIY has less debt than LGDDF: TNLIY (151M) vs LGDDF (5.05B). LGDDF has higher revenues than TNLIY: LGDDF (9.16B) vs TNLIY (429M).
LGDDFTNLIYLGDDF / TNLIY
Capitalization3.16B1.12B283%
EBITDA1.41B126M1,121%
Gain YTD-2.2120.000-
P/E Ratio12.4814.0189%
Revenue9.16B429M2,134%
Total Cash396M121M327%
Total Debt5.05B151M3,342%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGDDF: Fundamental Ratings
LGDDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGDDFTNLIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGDDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TNLIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBGEX57.490.84
+1.48%
Neuberger Genesis Tr
TEGCX16.870.19
+1.14%
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
BWLIX25.920.14
+0.54%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value Inv
MSGQX11.840.05
+0.42%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars C
TEMUX18.450.04
+0.22%
Morgan Stanley Pathway Em Mkts Eq

LGDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGDDF and WEBJF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGDDF and WEBJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGDDF
1D Price
Change %
LGDDF100%
N/A
WEBJF - LGDDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOSSF - LGDDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSMNF - LGDDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNLIY - LGDDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUIFF - LGDDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TNLIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNLIY and ONVC have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNLIY and ONVC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNLIY
1D Price
Change %
TNLIY100%
N/A
ONVC - TNLIY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUIFF - TNLIY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEBJF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOSSF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSMNF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More