Advertisement
LGDDF vs TNLIY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGDDF is a Hold and TNLIY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LGDDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNLIY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LGDDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TNLIY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LGDDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNLIY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LGDDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TNLIY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
LGDDF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TNLIY (@Consumer Sundries) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.41%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.89%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+0.07% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Consumer Sundries (-0.11% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
| LGDDF | TNLIY | LGDDF / TNLIY | |
| Capitalization | 3.09B | 1.16B | 268% |
| EBITDA | 1.41B | 126M | 1,121% |
| Gain YTD | -1.750 | -26.316 | 7% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.30 | 13.93 | 88% |
| Revenue | 9.16B | 429M | 2,134% |
| Total Cash | 396M | 121M | 327% |
| Total Debt | 5.05B | 151M | 3,342% |
LGDDF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LGDDF | TNLIY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 22% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 6% | 3 days ago 38% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 13% | 3 days ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 10% | 3 days ago 29% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 18% | 3 days ago 10% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 20% | 3 days ago 18% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 13% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | N/A |
Advertisement
LGDDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LGDDF and WEBJF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGDDF and WEBJF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGDDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGDDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WEBJF - LGDDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WOSSF - LGDDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LSMNF - LGDDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TNLIY - LGDDF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TUIFF - LGDDF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TNLIY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TNLIY and ONVC have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNLIY and ONVC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNLIY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNLIY | 100% | N/A | ||
| ONVC - TNLIY | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TUIFF - TNLIY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WEBJF - TNLIY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WOSSF - TNLIY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LSMNF - TNLIY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||