Advertisement
LGDDF vs LSMNF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGDDF is a Hold and LSMNF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LGDDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLSMNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LGDDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LSMNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LGDDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LGDDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
LGDDF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LSMNF (@Consumer Sundries) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +38.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.11%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+0.83% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Consumer Sundries (-0.17% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
| LGDDF | LSMNF | LGDDF / LSMNF | |
| Capitalization | 3.3B | 206M | 1,602% |
| EBITDA | 1.41B | 40.8M | 3,461% |
| Gain YTD | 7.545 | -16.478 | -46% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.52 | 13.46 | 100% |
| Revenue | 9.16B | 332M | 2,758% |
| Total Cash | 396M | 157M | 252% |
| Total Debt | 5.05B | 16.7M | 30,222% |
LGDDF | LSMNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LGDDF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as LSMNF (34). This means that LGDDF’s stock grew similarly to LSMNF’s over the last 12 months.
LGDDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as LSMNF (100). This means that LGDDF’s stock grew similarly to LSMNF’s over the last 12 months.
LSMNF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGDDF (92). This means that LSMNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGDDF’s over the last 12 months.
LGDDF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LSMNF (81). This means that LGDDF’s stock grew similarly to LSMNF’s over the last 12 months.
LSMNF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGDDF (98). This means that LSMNF’s stock grew significantly faster than LGDDF’s over the last 12 months.
| LGDDF | LSMNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 5% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% | 2 days ago 15% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 13% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
LGDDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LGDDF and ABNB have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGDDF and ABNB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGDDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGDDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ABNB - LGDDF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
| WEBJF - LGDDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LSMNF - LGDDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WOSSF - LGDDF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TNLIY - LGDDF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
LSMNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSMNF and ABNB have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSMNF and ABNB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSMNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSMNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ABNB - LSMNF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
| TUIFF - LSMNF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TNLIY - LSMNF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ONVC - LSMNF | 0% Poorly correlated | -13.65% | ||
| LGDDF - LSMNF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||