LGCL
Price
$2.39
Change
-$0.20 (-7.72%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.77M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAGS
Price
$9.39
Change
-$0.05 (-0.53%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.73B
104 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGCL vs PAGS

Header iconLGCL vs PAGS Comparison
Open Charts LGCL vs PAGSBanner chart's image
Lucas GC
Price$2.39
Change-$0.20 (-7.72%)
Volume$36.23K
Capitalization6.77M
PagSeguro Digital
Price$9.39
Change-$0.05 (-0.53%)
Volume$10.14M
Capitalization2.73B
LGCL vs PAGS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGCL vs. PAGS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCL is a Hold and PAGS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LGCL: $2.59 vs. PAGS: $9.44)
Brand notoriety: LGCL and PAGS are both not notable
LGCL represents the Packaged Software, while PAGS is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGCL: 11% vs. PAGS: 128%
Market capitalization -- LGCL: $6.77M vs. PAGS: $2.73B
LGCL [@Packaged Software] is valued at $6.77M. PAGS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $294.81B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.74T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.56B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGCL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LGCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAGS is a better buy in the long-term than LGCL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGCL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGCL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PAGS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LGCL is a better buy in the short-term than PAGS.

Price Growth

LGCL (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.50% price change this week, while PAGS (@Computer Communications) price change was -1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.27%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAGS is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.88% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (-1.70% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAGS($2.73B) has a higher market cap than LGCL($6.77M). PAGS has higher P/E ratio than LGCL: PAGS (7.01) vs LGCL (0.97). PAGS YTD gains are higher at: 57.414 vs. LGCL (-89.223). PAGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.44B vs. LGCL (36.9M). PAGS has higher revenues than LGCL: PAGS (19.3B) vs LGCL (1.06B).
LGCLPAGSLGCL / PAGS
Capitalization6.77M2.73B0%
EBITDA36.9M8.44B0%
Gain YTD-89.22357.414-155%
P/E Ratio0.977.0114%
Revenue1.06B19.3B6%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAGS: Fundamental Ratings
PAGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGCLPAGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGCL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGCPX16.700.14
+0.85%
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq P
HGXFX16.960.06
+0.36%
Hartford Global Impact F
AFJCX24.570.08
+0.33%
Virtus NFJ International Value C
JIJCX15.240.04
+0.26%
JHancock International Dynamic Gr C
FCGSX30.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Growth Company

LGCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGCL and BMBL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGCL and BMBL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGCL
1D Price
Change %
LGCL100%
-0.38%
BMBL - LGCL
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
GDRX - LGCL
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
PAYS - LGCL
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
AISP - LGCL
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
PAGS - LGCL
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.93%
More

PAGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGS has been closely correlated with STNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGS jumps, then STNE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAGS
1D Price
Change %
PAGS100%
-4.93%
STNE - PAGS
79%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
COIN - PAGS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.00%
CLSK - PAGS
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.09%
COMP - PAGS
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
FIVN - PAGS
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
More