LGCFF
Price
$1.57
Change
+$0.02 (+1.29%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
92.25M
TSGZF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
42.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGCFF vs TSGZF

Header iconLGCFF vs TSGZF Comparison
Open Charts LGCFF vs TSGZFBanner chart's image
Lavras Gold
Price$1.57
Change+$0.02 (+1.29%)
Volume$40.14K
Capitalization92.25M
TriStar Gold
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$185.96K
Capitalization42.14M
LGCFF vs TSGZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LGCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGCFF vs. TSGZF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCFF is a Hold and TSGZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (LGCFF: $1.57 vs. TSGZF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: LGCFF and TSGZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGCFF: 114% vs. TSGZF: 166%
Market capitalization -- LGCFF: $92.25M vs. TSGZF: $42.14M
LGCFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $92.25M. TSGZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGCFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSGZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LGCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TSGZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGCFF is a better buy in the long-term than TSGZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGCFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSGZF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGCFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TSGZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSGZF is a better buy in the short-term than LGCFF.

Price Growth

LGCFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.68% price change this week, while TSGZF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.35% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGCFF($92.2M) has a higher market cap than TSGZF($42.1M). TSGZF YTD gains are higher at: 32.111 vs. LGCFF (0.000). TSGZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.8M vs. LGCFF (-3.77M). LGCFF has more cash in the bank: 10.4M vs. TSGZF (6.66M). LGCFF (0) and TSGZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LGCFFTSGZFLGCFF / TSGZF
Capitalization92.2M42.1M219%
EBITDA-3.77M-1.8M209%
Gain YTD0.00032.111-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash10.4M6.66M156%
Total Debt147KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSGZF: Fundamental Ratings
TSGZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGCFFTSGZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEYCX29.75N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% C
BWNYX31.84-0.02
-0.06%
Bullfinch Greater Western New York
WFINX60.56-0.34
-0.56%
Allspring Index C
GTCEX30.15-0.18
-0.59%
Glenmede Strategic Equity
DRTHX21.36-0.19
-0.88%
BNY Mellon Sustainable US Eq Fd Z

LGCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGCFF and PHNMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGCFF and PHNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGCFF
1D Price
Change %
LGCFF100%
+0.96%
PHNMF - LGCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+12.31%
TSGZF - LGCFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
DC - LGCFF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-4.66%
LUGDF - LGCFF
-7%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
PUMXF - LGCFF
-12%
Poorly correlated
+10.27%

TSGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSGZF and LGCFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSGZF and LGCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSGZF
1D Price
Change %
TSGZF100%
+0.50%
LGCFF - TSGZF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
ARMN - TSGZF
13%
Poorly correlated
-5.71%
UGDIF - TSGZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+12.01%
TGLDF - TSGZF
6%
Poorly correlated
-8.60%
TORXF - TSGZF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
More