LGCFF
Price
$1.57
Change
+$0.02 (+1.29%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
92.25M
PUMXF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
16.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGCFF vs PUMXF

Header iconLGCFF vs PUMXF Comparison
Open Charts LGCFF vs PUMXFBanner chart's image
Lavras Gold
Price$1.57
Change+$0.02 (+1.29%)
Volume$40.14K
Capitalization92.25M
Puma Exploration
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$10.25K
Capitalization16.94M
LGCFF vs PUMXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LGCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGCFF vs. PUMXF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCFF is a Hold and PUMXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (LGCFF: $1.57 vs. PUMXF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: LGCFF and PUMXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGCFF: 114% vs. PUMXF: 20%
Market capitalization -- LGCFF: $92.25M vs. PUMXF: $16.94M
LGCFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $92.25M. PUMXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $16.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGCFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePUMXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LGCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PUMXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PUMXF is a better buy in the long-term than LGCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGCFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUMXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGCFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PUMXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PUMXF is a better buy in the short-term than LGCFF.

Price Growth

LGCFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.68% price change this week, while PUMXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +20.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.35% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGCFF($92.2M) has a higher market cap than PUMXF($16.9M). PUMXF YTD gains are higher at: 80.971 vs. LGCFF (0.000). PUMXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.33M vs. LGCFF (-3.77M). LGCFF has more cash in the bank: 10.4M vs. PUMXF (89.3K). LGCFF (0) and PUMXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LGCFFPUMXFLGCFF / PUMXF
Capitalization92.2M16.9M546%
EBITDA-3.77M-1.33M284%
Gain YTD0.00080.971-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash10.4M89.3K11,646%
Total Debt147KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PUMXF: Fundamental Ratings
PUMXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGCFFPUMXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEYCX29.75N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% C
BWNYX31.84-0.02
-0.06%
Bullfinch Greater Western New York
WFINX60.56-0.34
-0.56%
Allspring Index C
GTCEX30.15-0.18
-0.59%
Glenmede Strategic Equity
DRTHX21.36-0.19
-0.88%
BNY Mellon Sustainable US Eq Fd Z

LGCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGCFF and PHNMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGCFF and PHNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGCFF
1D Price
Change %
LGCFF100%
+0.96%
PHNMF - LGCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+12.31%
TSGZF - LGCFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
DC - LGCFF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-4.66%
LUGDF - LGCFF
-7%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
PUMXF - LGCFF
-12%
Poorly correlated
+10.27%

PUMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUMXF and AUGO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUMXF and AUGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUMXF
1D Price
Change %
PUMXF100%
+10.27%
AUGO - PUMXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.15%
MAIFF - PUMXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
LUGDF - PUMXF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
DC - PUMXF
-9%
Poorly correlated
-4.66%
LGCFF - PUMXF
-12%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%