LGCFF
Price
$2.18
Change
+$0.03 (+1.40%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
132.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LUGDF
Price
$76.03
Change
+$2.95 (+4.04%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
18.48B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGCFF vs LUGDF

Header iconLGCFF vs LUGDF Comparison
Open Charts LGCFF vs LUGDFBanner chart's image
Lavras Gold
Price$2.18
Change+$0.03 (+1.40%)
Volume$227.13K
Capitalization132.89M
Lundin Gold
Price$76.03
Change+$2.95 (+4.04%)
Volume$18.68K
Capitalization18.48B
LGCFF vs LUGDF Comparison Chart in %
LGCFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LUGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGCFF vs. LUGDF commentary
Feb 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCFF is a Hold and LUGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 09, 2026
Stock price -- (LGCFF: $2.18 vs. LUGDF: $76.03)
Brand notoriety: LGCFF and LUGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGCFF: 182% vs. LUGDF: 40%
Market capitalization -- LGCFF: $132.89M vs. LUGDF: $18.48B
LGCFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $132.89M. LUGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $140.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGCFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLUGDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LGCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than LGCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGCFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUGDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGCFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the short-term than LGCFF.

Price Growth

LGCFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while LUGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +165.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +91.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+165.92% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUGDF($18.5B) has a higher market cap than LGCFF($133M). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: -8.442 vs. LGCFF (-12.800). LUGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. LGCFF (-4.04M). LUGDF has more cash in the bank: 83M vs. LGCFF (7.55M). LGCFF has less debt than LUGDF: LGCFF (133K) vs LUGDF (298M). LUGDF has higher revenues than LGCFF: LUGDF (1.6B) vs LGCFF (0).
LGCFFLUGDFLGCFF / LUGDF
Capitalization133M18.5B1%
EBITDA-4.04M1.12B-0%
Gain YTD-12.800-8.442152%
P/E RatioN/A26.87-
Revenue01.6B-
Total Cash7.55M83M9%
Total Debt133K298M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUGDF: Fundamental Ratings
LUGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
18
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGCFFLUGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGCFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LUGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USSG64.091.48
+2.36%
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Eq ETF
FPRO23.490.39
+1.70%
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF
CGO12.240.18
+1.49%
Calamos Global Total Return Fund
WEEL20.030.18
+0.91%
Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF
GBIL100.010.02
+0.02%
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Yr ETF

LGCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGCFF and KGC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGCFF and KGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGCFF
1D Price
Change %
LGCFF100%
+1.35%
KGC - LGCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
PZG - LGCFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.81%
ORLA - LGCFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.48%
NFGC - LGCFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.25%
LUGDF - LGCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.03%
More

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
+4.03%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+3.77%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+5.34%
TORXF - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+5.74%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+2.69%
GOLD - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+9.87%
More