LGCFF
Price
$1.64
Change
+$0.03 (+1.86%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
95.65M
LUGDF
Price
$61.59
Change
+$0.91 (+1.50%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
14.78B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGCFF vs LUGDF

Header iconLGCFF vs LUGDF Comparison
Open Charts LGCFF vs LUGDFBanner chart's image
Lavras Gold
Price$1.64
Change+$0.03 (+1.86%)
Volume$81.78K
Capitalization95.65M
Lundin Gold
Price$61.59
Change+$0.91 (+1.50%)
Volume$41.51K
Capitalization14.78B
LGCFF vs LUGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LGCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGCFF vs. LUGDF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCFF is a Hold and LUGDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (LGCFF: $1.64 vs. LUGDF: $61.59)
Brand notoriety: LGCFF and LUGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGCFF: 259% vs. LUGDF: 80%
Market capitalization -- LGCFF: $97.64M vs. LUGDF: $15.56B
LGCFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $97.64M. LUGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $91.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGCFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLUGDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LGCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than LGCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGCFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUGDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LGCFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LGCFF and LUGDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LGCFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.44% price change this week, while LUGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +7.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3881.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUGDF($14.8B) has a higher market cap than LGCFF($95.6M). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 197.441 vs. LGCFF (4.398). LUGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.03B vs. LGCFF (-3.88M). LUGDF has more cash in the bank: 493M vs. LGCFF (13.3M). LGCFF has less debt than LUGDF: LGCFF (161K) vs LUGDF (298M). LUGDF has higher revenues than LGCFF: LUGDF (1.47B) vs LGCFF (0).
LGCFFLUGDFLGCFF / LUGDF
Capitalization95.6M14.8B1%
EBITDA-3.88M1.03B-0%
Gain YTD4.398197.4412%
P/E RatioN/A24.15-
Revenue01.47B-
Total Cash13.3M493M3%
Total Debt161K298M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUGDF: Fundamental Ratings
LUGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGCFFLUGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
80%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTE2.230.02
+0.90%
Baytex Energy Corp
LEVI22.370.11
+0.49%
Levi Strauss & Co
VIASP25.58-0.07
-0.27%
Via Renewables
AUID4.46-0.05
-1.22%
authID
BBCP6.96-0.11
-1.56%
Concrete Pumping Holdings

LGCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGCFF and PHNMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGCFF and PHNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGCFF
1D Price
Change %
LGCFF100%
+1.80%
PHNMF - LGCFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
TSGZF - LGCFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
DC - LGCFF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
LUGDF - LGCFF
-7%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
PUMXF - LGCFF
-12%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
+1.50%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+3.64%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+3.01%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+3.36%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
WPM - LUGDF
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
More