It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LFVN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LFVN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
LFVN (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while TR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +6.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.71%.
LFVN is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
TR is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2024.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
LFVN | TR | LFVN / TR | |
Capitalization | 77.9M | 2.23B | 3% |
EBITDA | 7.34M | 138M | 5% |
Gain YTD | 133.502 | 2.018 | 6,615% |
P/E Ratio | 26.91 | 24.04 | 112% |
Revenue | 211M | 769M | 27% |
Total Cash | 17.3M | 171M | 10% |
Total Debt | 13.8M | 15.9M | 87% |
LFVN | TR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LFVN's Valuation (52) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as TR (56) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew similarly to TR’s over the last 12 months.
TR's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LFVN (92) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry. This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to LFVN’s over the last 12 months.
LFVN's SMR Rating (58) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as TR (66) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew similarly to TR’s over the last 12 months.
LFVN's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as TR (47) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew similarly to TR’s over the last 12 months.
LFVN's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TR (69) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TR’s over the last 12 months.
LFVN | TR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago50% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago49% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago53% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago0% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago52% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LFVN and DAR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFVN and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFVN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN | 100% | -2.68% | ||
DAR - LFVN | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.19% | ||
FLO - LFVN | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
WEST - LFVN | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
TR - LFVN | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
SENEA - LFVN | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TR has been loosely correlated with THS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TR jumps, then THS could also see price increases.