LFVN vs TR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFVN is a Hold and TR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LFVN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LFVN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LFVN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LFVN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LFVN (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +12.39% price change this week, while TR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
LFVN is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.
TR is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.71% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| LFVN | TR | LFVN / TR | |
| Capitalization | 77.9M | 2.23B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 7.34M | 138M | 5% |
| Gain YTD | 44.381 | -3.371 | -1,316% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.91 | 24.04 | 112% |
| Revenue | 211M | 769M | 27% |
| Total Cash | 17.3M | 171M | 10% |
| Total Debt | 13.8M | 15.9M | 87% |
LFVN | TR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TR's Valuation (56) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LFVN (59) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry. This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to LFVN’s over the last 12 months.
LFVN's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TR (76) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TR’s over the last 12 months.
LFVN's SMR Rating (57) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as TR (65) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew similarly to TR’s over the last 12 months.
LFVN's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as TR (54) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew similarly to TR’s over the last 12 months.
LFVN's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TR (65) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that LFVN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TR’s over the last 12 months.
| LFVN | TR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 11 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 46% |
LFVN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LFVN and DAR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFVN and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFVN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFVN | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| DAR - LFVN | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
| TR - LFVN | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| LANC - LFVN | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
| FLO - LFVN | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| WEST - LFVN | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
More | ||||
TR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TR has been loosely correlated with THS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TR jumps, then THS could also see price increases.