Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFVCX vs SSGSX
LFVCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LFVCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value C
Price$28.77
Change+$1.33 (+4.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.82M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
LFVCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFVCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFVCX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. LFVCX (92.8M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LFVCX: SSGSX (0.58) vs LFVCX (0.00). LFVCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LFVCX (7 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). LFVCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). LFVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). LFVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LFVCX (1500) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. LFVCX (2.02). LFVCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.03 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| LFVCX | SSGSX | LFVCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.23 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.23 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.111 | 8.123 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.8M | 5.04B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.02 | 3.83 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.39 | -3.10 | -142% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.03 | -0.23 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement