Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFVCX vs SSGSX
LFVCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LFVCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value C
Price$28.29
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.66M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
LFVCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFVCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFVCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. LFVCX (92.7M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LFVCX: SSGSX (0.47) vs LFVCX (0.00). LFVCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LFVCX (6 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LFVCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LFVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LFVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LFVCX (1500) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. LFVCX (-2.18). LFVCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.20 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| LFVCX | SSGSX | LFVCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.26 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.26 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.176 | 2.046 | -9% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.7M | 5.64B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.18 | -1.56 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.05 | 3.97 | 379% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.20 | 22.95 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement