LFUS
Price
$233.17
Change
+$2.03 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.79B
17 days until earnings call
TTDKY
Price
$11.92
Change
-$0.08 (-0.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
22.45B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LFUS vs TTDKY

Header iconLFUS vs TTDKY Comparison
Open Charts LFUS vs TTDKYBanner chart's image
Littelfuse
Price$233.17
Change+$2.03 (+0.88%)
Volume$165.23K
Capitalization5.79B
TDK
Price$11.92
Change-$0.08 (-0.67%)
Volume$174.59K
Capitalization22.45B
LFUS vs TTDKY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFUS vs. TTDKY commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFUS is a Hold and TTDKY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (LFUS: $233.17 vs. TTDKY: $11.92)
Brand notoriety: LFUS and TTDKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFUS: 147% vs. TTDKY: 188%
Market capitalization -- LFUS: $5.79B vs. TTDKY: $22.45B
LFUS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $5.79B. TTDKY’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $22.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $83.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFUS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTTDKY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LFUS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TTDKY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTDKY is a better buy in the long-term than LFUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFUS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTDKY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFUS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TTDKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTDKY is a better buy in the short-term than LFUS.

Price Growth

LFUS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -0.83% price change this week, while TTDKY (@Electronic Components) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

LFUS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

TTDKY is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-0.01% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TTDKY($22.4B) has a higher market cap than LFUS($5.79B). LFUS has higher P/E ratio than TTDKY: LFUS (29.97) vs TTDKY (26.06). LFUS YTD gains are higher at: -1.052 vs. TTDKY (-8.025). TTDKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 446B vs. LFUS (426M). TTDKY has more cash in the bank: 752B vs. LFUS (631M). LFUS has less debt than TTDKY: LFUS (930M) vs TTDKY (687B). TTDKY has higher revenues than LFUS: TTDKY (2.13T) vs LFUS (2.2B).
LFUSTTDKYLFUS / TTDKY
Capitalization5.79B22.4B26%
EBITDA426M446B0%
Gain YTD-1.052-8.02513%
P/E Ratio29.9726.06115%
Revenue2.2B2.13T0%
Total Cash631M752B0%
Total Debt930M687B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LFUS vs TTDKY: Fundamental Ratings
LFUS
TTDKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6759
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6015
SMR RATING
1..100
773
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1772
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTDKY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as LFUS (26) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that TTDKY’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (60) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that TTDKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKY's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LFUS (77) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that TTDKY’s stock grew significantly faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKY's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as LFUS (74) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that TTDKY’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTDKY (72) in the null industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTDKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFUSTTDKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X104462.0400004705.133000
+4.72%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

LFUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been loosely correlated with CTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then CTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFUS
1D Price
Change %
LFUS100%
+0.88%
CTS - LFUS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
OLED - LFUS
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
BHE - LFUS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
TEL - LFUS
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
APH - LFUS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
More

TTDKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTDKY has been loosely correlated with MRAAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTDKY jumps, then MRAAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTDKY
1D Price
Change %
TTDKY100%
-0.67%
MRAAY - TTDKY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
LFUS - TTDKY
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
TTDKF - TTDKY
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
APH - TTDKY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
OLED - TTDKY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
More