LFT
Price
$2.24
Change
+$0.06 (+2.75%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
131.14M
20 days until earnings call
SOHOO
Price
$16.19
Change
+$0.09 (+0.56%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

LFT vs SOHOO

Header iconLFT vs SOHOO Comparison
Open Charts LFT vs SOHOOBanner chart's image
Lument Finance Trust
Price$2.24
Change+$0.06 (+2.75%)
Volume$212.13K
Capitalization131.14M
Sotherly Hotels
Price$16.19
Change+$0.09 (+0.56%)
Volume$1.87K
CapitalizationN/A
LFT vs SOHOO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOHOO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFT vs. SOHOO commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFT is a Buy and SOHOO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (LFT: $2.24 vs. SOHOO: $16.19)
Brand notoriety: LFT and SOHOO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFT: 79% vs. SOHOO: 263%
Market capitalization -- LFT: $131.14M vs. SOHOO: $0
LFT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $131.14M. SOHOO’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSOHOO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SOHOO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOHOO is a better buy in the long-term than LFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOHOO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SOHOO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SOHOO is a better buy in the short-term than LFT.

Price Growth

LFT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +4.19% price change this week, while SOHOO (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

LFT is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.02% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOHOO YTD gains are higher at: 0.578 vs. LFT (-8.110). SOHOO has less debt than LFT: SOHOO (318M) vs LFT (1.19B). SOHOO has higher revenues than LFT: SOHOO (174M) vs LFT (30.3M).
LFTSOHOOLFT / SOHOO
Capitalization131MN/A-
EBITDAN/A39.9M-
Gain YTD-8.1100.578-1,402%
P/E Ratio8.66N/A-
Revenue30.3M174M17%
Total CashN/A17.1M-
Total Debt1.19B318M375%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LFT vs SOHOO: Fundamental Ratings
LFT
SOHOO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8528
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6044
SMR RATING
1..100
60100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOHOO's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as LFT (13) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SOHOO’s stock grew similarly to LFT’s over the last 12 months.

SOHOO's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as LFT (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SOHOO’s stock grew similarly to LFT’s over the last 12 months.

LFT's SMR Rating (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOHOO (100) in the null industry. This means that LFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOHOO’s over the last 12 months.

SOHOO's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFT (91) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SOHOO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFT’s over the last 12 months.

LFT's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOHOO (100) in the null industry. This means that LFT’s stock grew significantly faster than SOHOO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFTSOHOO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOHOO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMFL0.100.01
+17.65%
American Films, Inc.
QNTQY27.80N/A
N/A
Qinetiq Group Plc.
CPPCY14.85N/A
N/A
CP All Public Co Ltd
FFMR66.00N/A
N/A
First Farmers Financial Corp
CGLCF0.18N/A
-0.71%
Cassiar Gold Corp.

LFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFT has been loosely correlated with DX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFT jumps, then DX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFT
1D Price
Change %
LFT100%
+2.75%
DX - LFT
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
RITM - LFT
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
MFA - LFT
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
MITT - LFT
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
KRC - LFT
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
More

SOHOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOHOO and EFC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOHOO and EFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOHOO
1D Price
Change %
SOHOO100%
+0.56%
EFC - SOHOO
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
DX - SOHOO
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
STWD - SOHOO
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
NLY - SOHOO
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
LFT - SOHOO
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
More