Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFSFX vs SSGSX
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LFSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F
Price$29.19
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.69M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFSFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. LFSFX (89.7M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LFSFX: SSGSX (0.48) vs LFSFX (0.00). LFSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LFSFX (7 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) and LFSFX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . LFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). LFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LFSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.42 vs. LFSFX (-3.06). LFSFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.91 vs. SSGSX (-0.63).
| LFSFX | SSGSX | LFSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.23 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.277 | -1.723 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.7M | 5.12B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.06 | -2.42 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.29 | 0.45 | 3,586% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.91 | -0.63 | -1,562% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.71 | - |