Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFSFX vs SSGSX
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LFSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F
Price$30.74
Change+$1.60 (+5.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.82M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFSFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. LFSFX (92.8M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LFSFX: SSGSX (0.58) vs LFSFX (0.02). LFSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LFSFX (7 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) and LFSFX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . LFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). LFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LFSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. LFSFX (3.36). LFSFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.55 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| LFSFX | SSGSX | LFSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.23 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.220 | 8.123 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.8M | 5.04B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.58 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | 3.83 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.20 | -3.10 | -264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.55 | -0.23 | -2,450% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement