Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFSFX vs SSGSX
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LFSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F
Price$30.28
Change+$0.15 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.04M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.05
Change+$0.29 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFSFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. LFSFX (91M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LFSFX: SSGSX (0.61) vs LFSFX (0.02). LFSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LFSFX (7 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) and LFSFX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . LFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). LFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LFSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). LFSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.26 vs. SSGSX (1.49). LFSFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.23 vs. SSGSX (-3.16).
| LFSFX | SSGSX | LFSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.23 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.616 | 5.281 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91M | 5.04B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.61 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.26 | 1.49 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.82 | -1.36 | -868% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.23 | -3.16 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers