Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFSFX vs SSGSX
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LFSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F
Price$28.75
Change+$0.55 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.37M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFSFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. LFSFX (89.4M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LFSFX: SSGSX (0.48) vs LFSFX (0.00). LFSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LFSFX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) and LFSFX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . LFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LFSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). LFSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.23 vs. SSGSX (-13.68). LFSFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.56 vs. SSGSX (4.92).
| LFSFX | SSGSX | LFSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.26 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.26 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.507 | 0.582 | -259% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.4M | 5.18B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.23 | -13.68 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.31 | -7.65 | -135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.56 | 4.92 | 316% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement