Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFSFX vs SSGSX
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LFSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F
Price$28.44
Change-$0.44 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.36M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFSFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. LFSFX (86.4M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LFSFX: SSGSX (0.49) vs LFSFX (0.00). LFSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LFSFX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) and LFSFX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . LFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LFSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.62 vs. LFSFX (-13.61). LFSFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.68 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| LFSFX | SSGSX | LFSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.26 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.26 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.314 | -0.129 | 2,565% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.4M | 5.23B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.61 | -12.62 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.04 | -6.25 | -113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.68 | 8.71 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement