Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFSFX vs SSGSX
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LFSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F
Price$29.03
Change+$0.14 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.58M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
LFSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFSFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. LFSFX (91.6M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LFSFX: SSGSX (0.51) vs LFSFX (0.00). LFSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LFSFX (6 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) and LFSFX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . LFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LFSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LFSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). LFSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.07 vs. SSGSX (-1.26). LFSFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.03 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| LFSFX | SSGSX | LFSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.26 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.26 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.812 | -2.068 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.6M | 5.82B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.07 | -1.26 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.96 | 2.38 | 713% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.03 | 29.33 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers