Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGVX vs RGEBX
LFGVX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LFGVX vs RGEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R6
Price$41.39
Change-$3.53 (-7.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.06M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
LFGVX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGVX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGVX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LFGVX (153M). LFGVX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LFGVX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LFGVX (7 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). LFGVX (1.10) and RGEBX (1.08) have similar cost to investors . LFGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). LFGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: LFGVX (0) vs RGEBX (250). LFGVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. RGEBX (1.80). LFGVX return over 5 years is better than : 27.63 vs. RGEBX (9.88).
| LFGVX | RGEBX | LFGVX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.08 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.08 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.181 | -1.057 | 301% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | 1.80 | 387% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.05 | 41.63 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.63 | 9.88 | 280% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement