Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGVX vs RGACX
LFGVX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LFGVX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R6
Price$42.74
Change+$0.09 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.03M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
LFGVX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGVX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGVX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. LFGVX (154M). RGACX pays higher dividends than LFGVX: RGACX (0.07) vs LFGVX (0.00). LFGVX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LFGVX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LFGVX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LFGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LFGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LFGVX (0) vs RGACX (250). LFGVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.37 vs. RGACX (14.08). LFGVX return over 5 years is better than : 67.74 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| LFGVX | RGACX | LFGVX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.94 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.94 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.140 | 14.044 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.37 | 14.08 | 301% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.38 | 41.19 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.74 | 41.95 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement