Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGVX vs RGACX
LFGVX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LFGVX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R6
Price$43.73
Change+$0.10 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.98M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
LFGVX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGVX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGVX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. LFGVX (165M). RGACX pays higher dividends than LFGVX: RGACX (0.07) vs LFGVX (0.00). LFGVX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LFGVX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LFGVX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LFGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LFGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LFGVX (0) vs RGACX (250). LFGVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.25 vs. RGACX (12.22). LFGVX return over 5 years is better than : 61.31 vs. RGACX (45.63).
| LFGVX | RGACX | LFGVX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.94 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.94 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.807 | 17.183 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.25 | 12.22 | 313% |
| Returns for 3 years | 123.23 | 71.26 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.31 | 45.63 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement