Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGTX vs RGACX
LFGTX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LFGTX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R5
Price$41.43
Change-$1.10 (-2.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.38M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.29
Change-$1.00 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.64B
LFGTX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGTX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGTX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. LFGTX (154M). RGACX pays higher dividends than LFGTX: RGACX (0.07) vs LFGTX (0.00). LFGTX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LFGTX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LFGTX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LFGTX (0) vs RGACX (250). LFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.32 vs. RGACX (11.81). LFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 59.71 vs. RGACX (38.00).
| LFGTX | RGACX | LFGTX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.94 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.257 | 12.918 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.32 | 11.81 | 341% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.53 | 43.79 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.71 | 38.00 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement