Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGTX vs RGACX
LFGTX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LFGTX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R5
Price$42.98
Change+$0.60 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.52M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
LFGTX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGTX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGTX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. LFGTX (158M). RGACX pays higher dividends than LFGTX: RGACX (0.07) vs LFGTX (0.00). LFGTX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LFGTX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LFGTX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LFGTX (0) vs RGACX (250). LFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.50 vs. RGACX (21.05). LFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 63.42 vs. RGACX (42.51).
| LFGTX | RGACX | LFGTX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.94 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.477 | 16.155 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.50 | 21.05 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.97 | 51.55 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.42 | 42.51 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement