Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGSX vs RGACX
LFGSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LFGSX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R4
Price$42.52
Change+$0.08 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.66M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
LFGSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGSX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LFGSX (169M). RGACX pays higher dividends than LFGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs LFGSX (0.00). LFGSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LFGSX (7 years) vs RGACX (24 years). LFGSX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). LFGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). LFGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LFGSX (0) vs RGACX (250). LFGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.19 vs. RGACX (5.45). LFGSX return over 5 years is better than : 38.01 vs. RGACX (20.43).
| LFGSX | RGACX | LFGSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.93 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.93 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.103 | 8.821 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.19 | 5.45 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 135.18 | 63.36 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.01 | 20.43 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement