Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGSX vs RGACX
LFGSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LFGSX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R4
Price$40.69
Change-$1.09 (-2.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.38M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.29
Change-$1.00 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.64B
LFGSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGSX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. LFGSX (154M). RGACX pays higher dividends than LFGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs LFGSX (0.00). LFGSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LFGSX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LFGSX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LFGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LFGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LFGSX (0) vs RGACX (250). LFGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.97 vs. RGACX (11.81). LFGSX return over 5 years is better than : 57.54 vs. RGACX (38.00).
| LFGSX | RGACX | LFGSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.94 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.065 | 12.918 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.97 | 11.81 | 338% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.11 | 43.79 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.54 | 38.00 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers