Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGQX vs RGEBX
LFGQX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LFGQX vs RGEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R3
Price$41.98
Change+$0.54 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.49M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$85.02
Change+$1.07 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
LFGQX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGQX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGQX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. LFGQX (161M). LFGQX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LFGQX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LFGQX (7 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). LFGQX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). LFGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). LFGQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: LFGQX (0) vs RGEBX (250). LFGQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.05 vs. RGEBX (11.57). LFGQX return over 5 years is better than : 47.51 vs. RGEBX (40.41).
| LFGQX | RGEBX | LFGQX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.09 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.09 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.492 | 19.009 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.05 | 11.57 | 277% |
| Returns for 3 years | 118.99 | 70.34 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.51 | 40.41 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.63 | - |