Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGFX vs RGACX
LFGFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LFGFX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth F
Price$43.44
Change+$0.10 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.98M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
LFGFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGFX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LFGFX (165M). RGACX pays higher dividends than LFGFX: RGACX (0.07) vs LFGFX (0.00). LFGFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LFGFX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LFGFX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LFGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). LFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LFGFX (0) vs RGACX (250). LFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.08 vs. RGACX (12.22). LFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.41 vs. RGACX (45.63).
| LFGFX | RGACX | LFGFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.94 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.724 | 17.183 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.08 | 12.22 | 312% |
| Returns for 3 years | 122.31 | 71.26 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.41 | 45.63 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement