Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGCX vs VIGRX
LFGCX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts LFGCX vs VIGRX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$37.28
Change+$0.50 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.18M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$227.62
Change+$2.45 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.94B
LFGCX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGCX vs. VIGRX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGCX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 294B vs. LFGCX (135M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than LFGCX: VIGRX (0.34) vs LFGCX (0.00). LFGCX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: LFGCX (6 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). LFGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: LFGCX (1500) vs VIGRX (3000). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.32 vs. VIGRX (15.43). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 115.36 vs. LFGCX (59.86).
| LFGCX | VIGRX | LFGCX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.17 | 1,059% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 0.17 | 1,294% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.808 | 7.729 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135M | 294B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.32 | 15.43 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.73 | 96.40 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.86 | 115.36 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 312.81 | - |