Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGCX vs VIGRX
LFGCX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts LFGCX vs VIGRX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$39.54
Change+$0.08 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.03M
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$237.87
Change-$0.79 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.3B
LFGCX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGCX vs. VIGRX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGCX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. LFGCX (154M). VIGRX pays higher dividends than LFGCX: VIGRX (0.32) vs LFGCX (0.00). LFGCX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: LFGCX (7 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). LFGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: LFGCX (1500) vs VIGRX (3000). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.76 vs. VIGRX (24.03). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 107.20 vs. LFGCX (57.72).
| LFGCX | VIGRX | LFGCX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.17 | 1,059% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 0.17 | 1,294% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.344 | 12.580 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 324B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.76 | 24.03 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.27 | 73.68 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.72 | 107.20 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 321.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers